A Study on the Rules of Co-Authorship in Chinese Context：Intellectual Contributions,Status and Credits

LIU Yu, WU Danwei, WEI Ruibin

LIBRARY TRIBUNE ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3) : 96-105.

PDF(1615 KB)
Search
E-mail
RSS
更多内容请点击
PDF(1615 KB)
LIBRARY TRIBUNE ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3) : 96-105.

A Study on the Rules of Co-Authorship in Chinese Context：Intellectual Contributions,Status and Credits

  • LIU Yu, WU Danwei, WEI Ruibin
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The importance of scientific collaboration has become evident in promoting scientific research,and its credit allocation has not received sufficient attention from the academic community. Studying the rules of co-authorship is conducive to revealing the mechanism of contributorship and credit allocation in scientific collaboration from a microscopic perspective. Using a sample of co-authored papers published in the journal Library and Information Service from 2015 to 2021,this article analyzes the factors influencing co-authorship credit allocation in terms of intellectual contribution and status using logistic regression. The study suggests that three intellectual activities,i.e. research design,writing the manuscript,and finalizing the paper,and author status have a significant impact on credit allocation;while the effect of writing supervision,data collection,and technical support is no longer significant when authorship status is controlled. The results show that the credit allocation in domestic scientific collaboration is jointly influenced by intellectual contributions and status;and relevant institutions should fully consider the impact of differences in author status on the credit allocation in the process of formulating scientific evaluation policies,in order to create a good ecological environment for scientific collaboration.

Key words

intellectual contribution / status / credit allocation / rule of authorship

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations
LIU Yu, WU Danwei, WEI Ruibin. A Study on the Rules of Co-Authorship in Chinese Context：Intellectual Contributions,Status and Credits[J]. LIBRARY TRIBUNE, 2024, 44(3): 96-105

References

[1] WUCHTY S,JONES B F,UZZI B.The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge[J]. Science,2007,316(5827):1036-1039.
[2] 王大顺,巴拉巴西.给科学家的科学思维[M].贾韬,汪小帆,译. 天津:天津科学技术出版社,2021.
[3] 王岩哲,刘凤红.作者贡献声明理论研究及其实践应用进展综述[J].中国科技期刊研究,2022,33(9):1186-1195.
[4] 中国科学院科研道德委员会.关于在学术论文署名中常见问题或错误的诚信提醒[EB/OL].(2019-05-05)[2022-11-09]. http://www.nssc.cas.cn/ztzl2015/kycx/xfjs2021/zdgf2/202105/t20210511_6012148.html.
[5] 徐秋颖.老师剽窃学生学术成果,学校可以做什么?[EB/OL]. (2021-11-14)[2022-11-07]. https://m.bjnews.com.cn/detail/163687865614733.html.
[6] WALTMAN L.An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2012,6(4):700-711.
[7] WOHLRABE K,BORNMANN L.Alphabetized co-authorship in economics reconsidered[J]. Scientometrics,2022,127(5):2173-2193.
[8] 周白瑜,李佳蔚,段春波,等.科研论文作者署名及排序的几点思考[J].科技与出版,2020(2):106-110.
[9] CORRÊA Jr E A,SILVA F N,COSTA L F,et al. Patterns of authors' contribution in scientific manuscripts[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2017,11(2):498-510.
[10] MERTON R K.The matthew effect in science:the reward and communication systems of science are considered[J]. Science,1968,159(3810):56-63.
[11] 默顿. 科学社会学:理论与经验研究[M].鲁旭东,林聚任,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.
[12] SIMCOE T S,WAGUESPACK D M.Status,quality,and attention:what's in a (missing) name?[J]. Management Science,2011,57(2):274-290.
[13] TOMKINS A,ZHANG M,HEAVLIN W D.Reviewer bias in single-versus double-blind peer review[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2017,114(48):12708-12713.
[14] PETERSEN A M,FORTUNATO S,PAN R K,et al.Reputation and impact in academic careers[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2014,111(43):15316-15321.
[15] JIN G Z,JONES B,LU S F,et al.The reverse matthew effect:catastrophe and consequence in scientific teams[EB/OL]. [2022-11-07].https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w19489/w19489.pdf.
[16] 丁敬达,王新明.作者贡献声明及与作者署名之间的关系——基于3种图情学期刊的实证研究[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(24):63-70.
[17] 崔林蔚,陆颖.基于作者署名排序的作者贡献要素分析——以《图书情报工作》2015-2016年作者贡献声明为例[J].图书情报工作,2017,61(9):80-86.
[18] Policy on papers' contributors[J]. Nature,1999,399(6735):393.
[19] 沈菲飞. 政策导向对高校稿件外流的影响——基于15所高校的制度文本分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018,29(12):1192-1200.
[20] 郭婷婷,李刚.通信作者标注制度研究[J].图书馆论坛,2019,39(2):1-10.
[21] 马英敏,田文灿,曹仁猛,等. 科技论文中通信作者和末位作者重要性的比较[J].中国科技期刊研究,2021,32(7):910-916.
[22] Defining the role of authors and contributors[EB/OL] .[2022-09-28].http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html.
[23] 张闪闪,顾立平.作者贡献声明政策的初探性研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(11):1113-1121.
[24] 张梦莹,章成志,王杰. 不同学科的作者贡献分布差异研究——以图情和医学领域的四种期刊为例[J].图书馆论坛,2018,38(12):112-119.
[25] Author contributions[EB/OL]. [2022-09-28].https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/Author%20contributions.docx.
[26] NATIDNAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. Transparency in author contributions in science (TACS) [EB/OL].[2022-09-28]. http://www.nasonline.org/about-nas/Transparency_Author_Contributions.html.
[27] DENNIS W.Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years[J]. Journal of Gerontology,1966,21(1):1-8.
[28] 刘俊婉,金碧辉.高被引科学家论文产出力的年龄分析[J].科研管理,2009,30(3):96-103,123.
[29] 岳洪江,梁立明,刘思峰,等.中国管理科学研究队伍的年龄结构研究[J].科研管理,2011,32(4):120-127.
[30] 崔鹤,王丹.中国高等教育研究领域个体、机构及地域科研合作情况研究——基于2016年18家教育类中文核心期刊的合著文献分析[J].中国高教研究,2017(4):48-55.
[31] RONAY R,GREENAWAY K,ANICICH E M,et al.The oath to glory is paved with hierarchy:when hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness[J]. Psychological Science,2012,23(6):669-677.
[32] SWAAB R I,SCHAERER M,ANICICH E M,et al.The too-much-talent effect:team interdependence determines when more talent is too much or not enough[J]. Psychological Science,2014,25(8):1581-1591.
[33] SCOTT J. Discord turns academe’s hot team cold[N/OL]. New York Times,1998-11-12[2023-05-10]. https://www.nytimes.com/1998/11/21/arts/discord-turns-academe-s-hot-team-cold.html.
[34] LARIVIÈRE V,DESROCHERS N,MACALUSO B,et al. Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production[J]. Social Studies of Science,2016,46(3):417-435.
[35] 周志华. 如何做研究与写论文?[EB/OL]. [2022-12-08].https://new.qq.com/rain/a/20210823A09GHP00.
[36] 阎光才. 学术生命周期与年龄作为政策的工具[J].北京大学教育评论,2016,14(4):124-138,188.
[37] 田美,陆根书.发表还是出局? ——“Tenure-track”机制下青年教师发表国际学术期刊论文的压力[J].复旦教育论坛,2016,14(5):14-20,34.
[38] ILAKOVAC V,FISTER K,MARUSIC M,et al.Reliability of disclosure forms of authors' contributions[J]. Candian Medical Association Journal,2007,176(1):41-46.
PDF(1615 KB)

108

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended
  • Links:
Copyright © LIBRARY TRIBUNE, All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-83360705　
E-mail：tsglt@vip.163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd,.

/

〈 〉