LI Xuguang, WANG Man, HU Yi, LU Yingying, CHI Maomao
LIBRARY TRIBUNE. 2026, 46(2): 53-67.
The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has posed global challenges to technology governance. Research on the roles of governments and governance pathways reveals the differentiated characteristics and evolutionary patterns of global GAI regulation,providing theoretical insights into GAI governance. This paper presents a four-quadrant model for identifying government roles in GAI regulation,and defines four roles:controller,leader,promoter,and monitor. Then,a qualitative content analysis is conducted on 19 policy documents from eight countries/regions. The study compares the regulatory characteristics and government role orientations of various nations/regions,identifying typical governance pathways and the inherent logic of the four roles. The study reveals significant differences in governmental roles across countries/regions. The governance pathways of the four roles exhibit distinct characteristics:“defensive centralized control”,“strategic leadership and guidance”,“market-incentive coordination”,and “responsive social co-governance”,as well as three trends:the diversification of regulatory tools,the decentralization of power with shared responsibility,and the dynamic evolution between governance pathways. The paper recommends establishing a dynamic governance system featuring “technology stage-role alignment”,developing a composite governance framework centered on “role synergy”,and strengthening international collaboration and regulatory coordination.